Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1127): 20210753, 2021 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1379813

ABSTRACT

Adrenal hemorrhage (AH) is a rare condition. It can be traumatic or non-traumatic. Most common causes are septicemia, coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis, and underlying neoplasms. Other reported less common causes of AH are COVID-19 and neonatal stress. Clinical diagnosis of AH is challenging due to its non-specific presentation and occurrence in the setting of acute medical illness. Therefore, most cases are diagnosed incidentally on imaging. Having high clinical suspicion in the proper clinical setting for AH is crucial to avoid life-threatening adrenal insufficiency that occurs in 16-50% of patients with bilateral AH. We discuss the clinical situations that predispose to AH, review the imaging features on different imaging modalities, highlight a variety of clinical cases, imaging features that should be concerning for an underlying neoplasm, and outline the potential role of interventional radiology in management of AH.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Gland Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Adrenal Gland Diseases/physiopathology , Adrenal Glands/diagnostic imaging , Adrenal Glands/physiopathology , Hemorrhage/physiopathology , Humans
2.
Emerg Radiol ; 28(3): 485-495, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1053014

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems and patients alike across the USA. We seek to elucidate changes in abdominal imaging ordered from the emergency department (ED) in a healthcare system undergoing non-surge conditions in April 2020 compared to April 2019. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study comparing patients undergoing CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis ordered from the ED in April 2020 vs. April 2019 at a single healthcare center. Via review of the radiology report and electronic medical record, we determined the positive or negative status of these scans. We evaluated percentages of positive CT scans and differences in outcomes, including admission rates, interventions, and mortality. RESULTS: Comparing 2020 to 2019, there was a 31.6% decrease in the number of CT scans performed from the ED. We found a higher percentage of positive CT findings, 58.2% vs. 50.8% (p = 0.025), and increased admission rates, 40.8% vs. 34.1% (p = 0.036). Differences were found in rates of appendicitis, colitis, and cholangitis. No difference was found in ICU admissions, interventions, or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic in a region undergoing non-surge conditions, we found increased rates of positive CT scans performed from the ED for abdominal complaints with an increased percentage of hospital admissions compared to a control year. No differences in ICU admissions or rates of procedural intervention were found to suggest higher acuity of pathology on presentation. Our findings suggest appropriately decreased healthcare utilization in our study period, driven by pre-hospital patient self-selection.


Subject(s)
Abdomen, Acute/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Abdomen, Acute/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Utah/epidemiology , Utilization Review
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL